- Typical range
- Adult ~70 kg — ¥100,000–140,000 per procedure. Course of 3 procedures — ¥300,000–420,000.
- What affects the price
- The cost depends on weight, cell type, and route of administration. Additional examinations (MRI, EEG) are also possible — accounted for separately.
Dossier №
003
/ 010─── Neurology
Stroke and its consequences
Abstract
Acute cerebrovascular accident with neuronal death in the infarct zone and the formation of a neurological deficit. Cell therapy targets angiogenesis, penumbra neuroprotection, and support of neuroplasticity.
- Mechanisms
- 5
- Protocols
- 5
Expected results
What to expect after the course
Timeline of effect — observations from Hanshi United practice. Individual results depend on disease severity, age, and parallel rehabilitation.
Period
3 weeks
Reduction of spasticity in paretic limbs, improved muscle tone, normalisation of sleep.
Period
3–6 months
Motor function progress — expanded range of active movements, improved fine motor skills of the hand. Speech progress in aphasia — vocabulary expansion, improved articulation.
Period
1 year
Improvement on Frenchay, NIHSS scales. Ability to walk independently in some patients with hemiparesis. Return to some everyday functions — self-care, reading, simple work.
The therapy effect is not guaranteed — it depends on many factors and is assessed individually by the physician.
How it works
How cell therapy helps
After a stroke, a 'penumbra' forms around the necrosis zone — partially damaged tissue whose neurons are still alive but non-functional. This is the critical zone for recovery. Cell therapy acts on the penumbra through angiogenesis, neuroprotection, and reduction of gliosis.
Key mechanisms
- Angiogenesis stimulation — formation of new capillaries in ischaemic zones
- Penumbra neuroprotection — rescue of 'dormant' neurons from apoptosis
- Reduction of glial scarring — facilitating axonal growth through the damage zone
- Activation of endogenous neurogenesis — mobilisation of subventricular zone stem cells
- Immunomodulation — reduction of chronic neuroinflammation around the scar zone
About the condition — in depth
Expand a chapter to read scientific detail — neurobiology, epidemiology, the standard of care, and the rationale for cell therapy.
01Definition and recovery periods
Show details
Stroke is the third most common cause of death and the leading cause of disability in adults. Ischaemic stroke (about 85% of cases) — occlusion of a cerebral artery by thrombus or embolus — is distinguished from haemorrhagic stroke — vessel rupture with intracerebral haemorrhage. After the acute period (4–6 weeks) a scar zone forms and neurological deficits persist: hemiparesis, speech disorders (aphasia), cognitive impairment, coordination problems. Standard rehabilitation produces its greatest effect within the first 3–6 months, after which the pace of recovery sharply declines. Cell therapy is considered in the subacute (1–3 months post-stroke) and chronic (3–12+ months) periods as a means of extending the rehabilitation window and reactivating the brain's intrinsic recovery resources.
02Epidemiology and risk factors
Show details
According to WHO, approximately 13 million new strokes are recorded worldwide each year, with around 5.5 million deaths attributable to them. In Russia about 450,000 cases occur annually; 30–35% of patients die within the first year, and 60–70% of survivors carry long-term functional limitations. Major modifiable risk factors are arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, smoking, abdominal obesity, and physical inactivity. Non-modifiable factors include age, male sex (until 75 years), heredity, and presence of thrombophilic states. Secondary prevention is the obligatory background of any rehabilitation, including cell-based therapy: without blood-pressure control, antiplatelet therapy in ischaemic stroke, or anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, any regenerative method works against a continuous risk of recurrence.
03Pathogenesis of injury
Show details
The pathophysiology of ischaemic stroke unfolds as a cascade lasting from minutes to weeks. Within seconds of occlusion, neurons in the core lose ATP, membranes depolarise, glutamate is massively released, and calcium excitotoxicity ensues; mitochondria fail and apoptotic caspases activate. Around the core a penumbra forms — functionally silent but still viable tissue. The size and fate of the penumbra depend on collateral flow and time to reperfusion; saving it is the goal of acute therapy. Over the following days, activated microglia and neutrophils invade the lesion and a secondary inflammatory cascade ensues with IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 production. By 2–4 weeks a glial scar of reactive astrocytes and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans (CSPGs) forms, physically and biochemically obstructing axonal sprouting and the integration of new synapses. By this stage, spontaneous neuroplasticity diminishes, though it does not disappear.
04Standard therapy by phase
Show details
Standard stroke care is structured by phase. In the acute period the first line remains tPA thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, with extended endovascular thrombectomy windows of 6–24 hours in selected patients with confirmed viable penumbra on perfusion MRI. In the subacute and chronic periods secondary prevention is established and comprehensive rehabilitation is initiated — kinesiotherapy following Bobath or Brunnstrom principles, occupational therapy, speech therapy where aphasia is present, and modalities targeting neuroplasticity: CIMT (constraint-induced movement therapy), mirror therapy, FES, robot-assisted gait training, navigated rTMS, and tDCS. Each has its own niche and evidence base, but all leverage a single biological substrate — the brain's own neuroplasticity. The longer the post-stroke interval, the less this substrate spontaneously remodels.
05Role of cell therapy
Show details
Cell therapy does not replace rehabilitation; it amplifies its biological substrate. Following systemic infusion, UC-MSCs migrate to the lesion along chemotactic gradients (SDF-1/CXCR4) and over the following weeks function as a source of paracrine factors: stimulating angiogenesis (VEGF, FGF-2, IGF-1) with formation of new capillaries in the perilesional zone; switching microglial polarisation from M1 to M2 with reduction of local TNF-α and elevation of IL-10 and TGF-β; modifying the glial scar composition by lowering inhibitory CSPGs and easing axonal regrowth; and activating endogenous neurogenesis in the subventricular zone and dentate gyrus. Exosomes as a separate platform cross the blood-brain barrier and deliver microRNAs that regulate synaptic plasticity and neuronal survival. The combined effect is a widened biological window of neuroplasticity within which intensive motor and speech rehabilitation produces maximal gains. Without parallel rehabilitation, cell therapy is markedly attenuated — this is a foundational condition of our protocol.
06Hanshi United programme
Show details
The Hanshi United programme for stroke sequelae operationalises these principles in light of contemporary clinical evidence. Optimal initiation is 1–3 months after the acute event, when the patient is stable, reperfusion procedures (if indicated) are completed, and a secondary prevention plan is in place. The standard course consists of three procedures at 15–20 day intervals, typically combined: intrathecal administration for direct CNS impact plus intravenous for systemic immunomodulation. Recent data point to a more favourable safety profile for the IV route, so where intrathecal access is technically constrained we move to an IV-only course. In patients with chronic-phase stroke (>12 months), the effect is more modest but reproducible, particularly in speech, fine motor function, and cognitive domains. Background antiplatelet therapy and statins are not discontinued. Anticoagulants may require brief adjustment before an intrathecal procedure. All decisions are coordinated with the patient's treating neurologist.
Protocol
Treatment protocol
The course has three parts: which cells we use, how we administer them, and how long the programme runs. Expand each section to read the detail.
01Which cells we use
Show details
- UC-MSC
Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells
Young multipotent cells isolated from Wharton's jelly of the umbilical cord. High proliferative activity and low immunogenicity.
- Exosomes
Stem cell exosomes
Extracellular vesicles 30–150 nm in size carrying signalling molecules. Capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.
02How we administer them
Show details
- 01
Intravenous (systemic) administration
The most studied and widely used route. Cells distribute throughout the body via the bloodstream, delivering a powerful systemic effect.
- 02
Intrathecal administration into the CNS
Cells are injected directly into the subarachnoid space via lumbar puncture. The goal is to bypass the blood-brain barrier and deliver cells into the central nervous system.
- 05
Combined therapy
A combination of two routes for maximum effect. Most often intravenous administration for systemic support plus intrathecal for direct CNS impact.
03Course & intervals
Show details
- Intervals
- 15–20 days between procedures
- Course
- A course of 3 procedures. Optimal start — 1-3 months after the stroke. It is possible to start later, but the effect will be smaller.
- Notes
- In extensive strokes with pronounced neurological deficit, the standard regimen is combined (intrathecal + intravenous). Local administration is rarely used due to the risk of additional trauma.
Pricing
Treatment cost
Clinical evidence
Clinical evidence and publications
A selection of peer-reviewed clinical studies underpinning the protocol. Every link leads to the original publication on PubMed, PMC, or DOI.org — we deliberately do not paraphrase the conclusions, so that you can verify the context and methodology in the primary source.
et al.
Phase II RCT: 32 patients with ischaemic stroke sequelae. 2 UC-MSC infusions at 1.5×10⁶ cells/kg (IT or IV) + rehabilitation. IV group — fewer adverse events and earlier improvement in functional independence (6 months).
PubMedShow 2 more publications
- 02Stem Cells Translational Medicine2024
et al.
Placebo-controlled phase II of IV allogeneic non-HLA matched cord blood infusion for ischaemic stroke — confirms safety of immunomodulatory mechanism.
- 03BMC Neurology2025
et al.
Network meta-analysis — cell therapy significantly improves functional outcomes in ischaemic stroke compared with standard care.
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-025-04246-w
Citing a study does not imply that results reproduce identically in every patient. Cell therapy is always tailored individually by the Hanshi United academic board, accounting for age, disease severity, and comorbidities.
FAQ
Frequent questions on the diagnosis
Related
Related therapies
- 01
Cerebral palsy
A group of permanent disorders of movement and posture caused by damage to the developing brain. Cell therapy targets neuroprotection, remyelination and reduction of chronic neuroinflammation.
- 02
Autism spectrum disorder
A neurodevelopmental disorder with persistent communication impairments and behavioural stereotypies. Cell therapy reduces neuroinflammation, improves the quality of interneuronal connections, and supports social and cognitive development.